BtoB Online - The Leading Source of B2B Marketing
SEARCH  
CURRENT ISSUE
The leading business to business marketing magazine
 
FEATURES
 
GUIDES
 
RESOURCES
 
MEDIA BUSINESS
 
ABOUT US
 
Create Measureable Action With Online Survey Solutions
How to Produce Successful Lead Gen Webcasts
Each issue of CMO Close-up features an interview with a CMO, as well as other marketing executives answering that issue's "Big Question."
This week's feature:
Close-up with Deb Oler, VP-Grainger Industrial Supply Brand, W.W. Grainger
Follow Us On:
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Facebook
Facebook

FEATURE STORY
 
Judging marketing metrics

Story posted: December 7, 2009 - 6:01 am EDT



When it comes to an effective marketing activity, Heidi Melin, CMO of Pleasanton, Calif.-based Polycom, a provider of communications technology to businesses, said appearances can be deceiving.

According to Melin, marketing campaigns that generate a great deal of interest and contact aren't necessarily the most efficient. Polycom runs a robust b-to-b marketing effort that includes targeted e-mail campaigns, trade shows, public relations and an online presence.

“We have a platform that measures all the responses that come into the top of our funnel and tracks them all the way to closing business,” Melin said. “We've found, for example, that trade shows generate a lot of contacts, but the business closed is not as high as a targeted e-mail campaign into our installed customer base.”

Melin's observation strikes at the heart of b-to-b marketing: How does a company know that any marketing campaign is truly effective when compared with other marketing activities?

Adam Needles, director of field marketing and b-to-b marketing for e-mail marketing services company Silverpop, has an answer: Stop looking at short-term, front-end metrics—such as impressions and click-throughs—and start looking at the lifetime value of customers.

“I would argue that most marketers get mired in operational metrics because they view their jobs as sales lead-generation,” Needles said. “But the only way to get our efficiency up as marketers is to focus on buyers. We need to look at the total lifetime value of cash flow of a customer from marketing activities. The consumer side figured this out a long time ago, but the b-to-b side needs to catch up.”

That, however, can be easier said than done. Even Polycom, which has been singled out by the CMO Council as a highly efficient marketing organization, doesn't measure the lifetime value of customers.

“It's too hard to define,” Melin said. “Almost everyone has a Polycom phone, so is that a customer or do we only concentrate on the video side?”

Instead, the CMO Council has proposed an alternative metric: customer affinity.

According to Donovan Neale-May, executive director of the council, customer affinity is a customer's “predisposition to do business with a product or service, a measure of attachment.”

Customer affinity goes beyond the basic metrics—ad spending, impressions, awareness, click-throughs, Web site hits and leads generated—to measure a customer's perceptions, attitudes and actual behavior.

Once again, of course, the issue quickly becomes one of availability of data.

“There's a lot of data out there—transactional data, attitudinal data—but a lot of it is siloed,” Neale-May said. “A lot of trouble with organizations (in this regard) is data integration.”

In the end, effectively measuring any marketing campaign comes down to available data: what happens to potential customers after the initial contact, which products do they buy, how do they use the products and how to best increase the long-term value of each individual customer.

“The piece of data that would be most valuable to us that we don't currently have (involves) continuing to build intelligence around our customers,” Melin said, “which products they have and how they're using them. That would be extremely interesting to me.”

This makes sense, Melin said, because the company's most effective marketing campaigns in terms of direct conversion to sales are still old-fashioned e-mail campaigns directed at Polycom's installed customer base.

“They're very effective, very robust and highly targeted,” Melin said. “And it's not just installed customers, but customers of specific products.”


4 Comments


Michael A Brown
President, The Business Marketing Consultancy
December 7, 2009 01:21 pm

Hooray for Heidi and Donovan for calling out the limits and quirks of marketing results metrics.

I counsel clients to look past the “local” numbers … cost per lead, and so on … and attend to the “big picture” value of a marketing or sales initiative in terms of its effect on the company’s median account acquisition cost and median account value. Specifically:

• Percent increase or decrease in the “typical” dollars expended to take a business opportunity from identification through the second order.

• Increase or decrease in account duration (how long they stay with you) and the actual money they spend with you.

The details vary by company, of course, and almost always require resolving information silos and turf issues. But it is worth doing because the results are meaningful. Marketing - sales alignment seems to improve also.

Michael A. Brown
The Business Marketing Consultancy
Austin, Texas

2343303
 
Emil Walcek
EJW Associates Inc President
December 7, 2009 01:30 pm

If Polycom really "measures all the responses that come into the top of our funnel and tracks them all the way to closing business", than it has accomplished what few B to B marketers even dream to achieve. Folks for whom CMS/ERP is a luxury plan and execute based on educated guesses that are good enough for now, until they can dedicate the resources that they may or may not realize can pay for themselves at some point in the future. I would add that the cost of making a wrong marketing choice not based on solid data can devastate budgets while failing to convert prospects and customers to profit-making orders.

"Lifetime customer value", "customer's perceptions, attitudes and actual behavior" are indeed everyday sales realities, but these terms are far removed from practical marketing of many in the B to B world. Thank you for expanding on this issue that should resonate with those too busy to allow such attention to customer and lead generating data. Hopefully, some will decide now is the time to move beyond company- to customer-centric marketing and discover it really can improve a bottom line while eliminating a lot of waste!

2343333
 
Grant A. Johnson
December 7, 2009 02:21 pm

Kudos! I just ran a piece that echos this: http://bit.ly/8IHnCZ

2343310
 
Pat LaPointe
Managing Partner - MarketingNPV
December 8, 2009 04:24 pm

Bravo to the customer value/profitability solution. It successfuly bridges the short- and long-term payback horizons, and does so in a bottom-line financial way. The answer to polycom's (very real) challenge however is not to revert back to the squishy and non-financial "customer affinity" metrics however. It's to aggregate customer value at the segment level. That's a terrific way to validate the effect of marketing programs without going all the way down the rabbit hole of individual customer value.

2343565
 

Post a Comment

  Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious
Digg This!
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
Subscribe to FREE BtoB Newsletters
  Share on LinkedIn
   

RELATED STORIES

 
 


Digital Edge Now On-Demand



Read the new issue:
The leading business to business marketing magazine




 

SITE MAP   |   MEDIA KIT   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   NEWSLETTER   |   WHITEPAPERS
 
BROWSE OUR NEWSLETTERS
BtoB - Daily News Alert
Email Marketer Insight
StraightLine Direct
Hands-On / Hands-On Search
Inside Technology Marketing
Rollout Advertising Newsletter
CMO Closeup Newsletter
Media Business Newsletter

BtoBonline.com Privacy Policy. Copyright 2006, Crain Communications Inc.
Information  |  For advertising information contact Robert Felsenthal.